To analyze the effects of wind on the boat dock, we need to calculate the wind forces acting on the various surfaces.

​

Assumptions and Key Data:

​

• Air Density: Approximately 0.0765 lbs/ft3 at standard conditions.

• Drag Coefficients (Cd):

  • Flat surfaces (dock sides, walkway, railings): 1.2−2.0 (we'll use 1.5 for a conservative estimate on flat plates perpendicular to flow, though some sources suggest up to 2.0 for structures).

  • Hip roof: Given the 30-degree pitch, the wind load can be complex, but for a direct side gust, we'll consider the exposed vertical projection and a suction effect on the leeward side. For simplicity, and as a conservative approach for direct side wind, we can approximate a Cd similar to a flat plate on the effective frontal area.

  • Boats: Highly variable, but for boats on lifts, a significant portion of their hull and superstructure will be exposed. We'll estimate a Cd of 1.0−1.5 for the exposed boat area.

• Wind Pressure Formula: P=0.00256×V2×Cd (where P is pressure in psf, V is wind speed in mph). This formula often incorporates 1/2ρV2 and includes conversions for standard air density.

• Weight of Steel Tubing:

  • 3-inch square 12 gauge steel tube: approximately 4.3 lbs/ft (interpolated from typical weights, 0.109" wall thickness for 12 gauge).

  • 2-inch square 16 gauge steel tube: approximately 1.69 lbs/ft.

• Water Density: 62.4 lbs/ft3.

• Winch Breaking Load: 2×3500 lbs=7000 lbs.

• 3/8" 316 SS Cable Breaking Strength: 11,760 lbs.

• 5/16" 316 SS Cable Breaking Strength: 8,825 lbs.
   

Dock Dimensions and Exposed Areas:

• Dock Plan Area: 28 ft×32 ft=896 sq. ft.

• Dock Height above water: 10 ft.

• Dock Exposed Side Area (South Side): 28 ft (width)×10 ft (height)=280 sq. ft.

• Roof: Hip style, covering 50% of the surface. We'll assume the roof height at the peak is approximately 1/4 of the width for a 30-degree pitch (tan(30) = 0.577, so height = 0.577 * 28 ft / 2 = 8.08 ft, let's assume average exposed roof height of 4-5 feet for wind calculations). For a wind from the south, the southern face of the hip roof will be exposed. The projected vertical area of the roof exposed to the south wind would be approximately 28 ft×average roof height exposed to wind. Given 50% coverage, we can assume a simplified approach for the side-on wind, considering the total height of the dock.

• Boat Slips: Two 10-foot wide slips. With boats on lifts, they are elevated.

• Boats:

  • Boat 1: 5000 lbs.

  • Boat 2: 3000 lbs.

  • Boat lifts: 1200 lbs each.

  • Total boat/lift weight: 5000+3000+1200+1200=10,400 lbs.

  • For wind load, we'll need to estimate the frontal area of the boats. Let's assume an average exposed height of 6 ft for each boat (above the deck) and an average width of 8 ft. This gives 6 ft×8 ft=48 sq. ft per boat. Total boat frontal area: 2×48 sq. ft=96 sq. ft.

• Walkway: 65 ft×3.5 ft.

  • Walkway exposed side area: Assuming railings add 3 ft of height with some open area. Let's estimate an effective solid area of 65 ft×1.5 ft (for railing and structure)=97.5 sq. ft.

• Water surface area affected: 28 ft×32 ft=896 sq. ft. The water moves in the wind's direction. This implies current drag on the submerged portion of the floats.
   

Calculations for 60 mph Wind:
 

1. Wind Pressure (P):

P60mph​=0.00256×(60 mph)2×Cd=0.00256×3600×Cd=9.216×Cd psf.
 

2. Wind Force on Dock Structure (South Side Facing Wind):

• Dock Frame (exposed vertical area): The frame is 3-inch square tube. The vertical members along the 28-foot side will be exposed. Assuming a perimeter frame and some internal bracing, we'd need more detail for precise calculation. For a simplified approach, we'll consider the effective solid area of the entire 28'x10' dock side, including the frame and decking.

• Dock Floor Decking: The decking is horizontal, so direct wind force on it from the south is negligible.

• Roof: For a hip roof, the wind will hit the southern face. The effective vertical projection of the roof for wind load needs to be estimated. Let's assume an average exposed height for the roof structure of 5 ft over the 28 ft width. Area = 28 ft×5 ft=140 sq. ft.

• Total Dock Side + Roof Exposed Area:

  • Dock side (assuming it's a solid wall effectively, for worst-case): 28 ft×10 ft=280 sq. ft.

  • Roof projected area (for direct wind, this is less clear for a hip roof from the side. For simplicity, let's consider the overall dock height as the main contributor for side wind on the structure).

  • Let's refine the dock structure area to be the overall exposed area. The dock is 10 feet high. The roof covers 50% of the surface, but the wind is from the side. We need the frontal area. The 28-foot width is facing the wind.

  • Assume a total effective exposed height of the dock structure (frame and decking up to roofline, and roof portion) to be 10 ft.

  • Effective frontal area of dock structure: 28 ft×10 ft=280 sq. ft. Let Cd=1.5.

  • Force on dock structure: Fdock_struct​=280 sq. ft×9.216×1.5 psf=3870.72 lbs.
     

3. Wind Force on Boats:

• Exposed area of boats: 96 sq. ft. Let Cd=1.2 (boats are somewhat streamlined).

• Force on boats: Fboats​=96 sq. ft×9.216×1.2 psf=1063.296 lbs.
   

4. Wind Force on Walkway and Railings:

• Exposed area of walkway and railings: 97.5 sq. ft. Let Cd=1.5.

• Force on walkway: Fwalkway​=97.5 sq. ft×9.216×1.5 psf=1347.12 lbs.
   

5. Water Current Drag on Floats:

• The water surface is affected by the wind. A 60 mph wind can generate significant current, but it's unlikely to immediately translate to a 60 mph current. For a 1500 ft wide body of water, the current generated by a 60 mph wind would be a fraction of the wind speed. For simplification, let's assume a current speed of 1-2% of wind speed as a rough estimate for open water. So, 0.015×60 mph=0.9 mph. Convert to ft/s: 0.9 mph×5280 ft/mile/3600 s/hr=1.32 ft/s.

• The floats lift the dock 16 inches above the water. The floats are submerged. The total buoyancy indicates the total weight of the dock + boats.

  • Dock floor weight: 896 sq. ft×4 lbs/sq. ft=3584 lbs.

  • Weight of steel frame:

    • Dock perimeter: (28+32)×2=120 ft. Assume some internal bracing. Let's estimate total linear feet of 3-inch 12 gauge steel tube on the dock. For a 28x32' dock, a grid might be 28' + 32' + 28' (mid) + 32' (mid) = 120ft perimeter + 60ft internal. Let's estimate 200 ft of tubing. 200 ft×4.3 lbs/ft=860 lbs.

    • Roof frame: Similar estimate. If 50% of the area is covered, maybe another 100 ft of tubing. 100 ft×4.3 lbs/ft=430 lbs.

    • Walkway frame: 65 ft long. Two main beams, maybe cross members. Say 150 ft of 2-inch 16 gauge. 150 ft×1.69 lbs/ft=253.5 lbs.

  • Total structural weight (rough estimate): 3584+860+430+253.5=5127.5 lbs.

  • Total weight on floats: 5127.5 lbs (dock/walkway structure)+10,400 lbs (boats/lifts)=15,527.5 lbs.

  • To lift 15,527.5 lbs (assuming buoyancy equals weight), the volume of submerged foam needed is 15,527.5 lbs/62.4 lbs/ft3≈248.84 ft3.

  • The floats are rectangular foam filled. Let's assume they have a certain depth.

  • For current drag, we need the submerged frontal area of the floats. Without knowing the float dimensions, we'll assume a certain depth. If the dock rides 16 inches (1.33 ft) above water, and the overall height is 10 ft, the frame is above water. The "floats" lift the lower deck surface 16 inches above the water, meaning they are primarily below the water surface. Let's assume the floats extend 2 ft below the water line.

  • Submerged frontal area of floats (across the 28 ft width): 28 ft (width)×2 ft (submerged depth)=56 sq. ft.

  • Current drag on floats: Using a drag formula for water F=0.5×ρwater​×V2×A×Cd. ρwater​=1.94 slugs/ft3 (for water density in slugs).

  • Fcurrent​=0.5×1.94 slugs/ft3×(1.32 ft/s)2×56 sq. ft×1.0 (Cd for submerged rectangular objects)=0.97×1.7424×56×1.0≈94.6 lbs. This is a relatively small force compared to wind.
     

Total Force from 60 mph Wind:

Ftotal_60mph​=Fdock_struct​+Fboats​+Fwalkway​+Fcurrent​=3870.72+1063.296+1347.12+94.6=6375.736 lbs.
 

Dock Anchor System:

The dock is attached to two anchor points on the shoreline with cables. Wind is from the south, pushing the dock north. This means the force will primarily be on the cables running to the north anchor point.

• Southwest corner cable to South anchor (at 45 degrees horizontal).

• Northwest corner cable to North anchor (at 45 degrees horizontal).

When wind is from the south, it pushes the dock north. The cable from the northwest corner to the north anchor will be under tension. The cable from the southwest corner to the south anchor might experience slack or some tension depending on how much the dock shifts and if there's any pre-tension. We will consider the primary load to be on the north cable.

The force of 6375.736 lbs is pushing the dock northward. The north cable is at a 45-degree angle.

The tension in the cable (T) will be such that its horizontal component balances the wind force.

T×cos(45∘)=Ftotal​

T=Ftotal​/cos(45∘)=Ftotal​/0.7071

Tension in the North Cable (60 mph):

T60mph​=6375.736 lbs/0.7071≈9016.7 lbs.
 

Events that occur during a 60 mph gust (60 seconds):

• Initial Shock Load: As the wind gust hits, there will be an initial shock load. The total force is applied rapidly. The dampening springs are critical here.

• Cable Tension: The tension in the north cable will rapidly increase to approximately 9016.7 lbs.

• Winch Performance: Each winch has a 3500 lbs WLL and a 7000 lbs breaking load. The tension of 9016.7 lbs exceeds the breaking load of a single winch. This is a critical failure point. The winch on the northwest corner will likely fail.

• Cable Strength: The 3/8" 316 SS cable has a breaking strength of 11,760 lbs. The tension (9016.7 lbs) is within the cable's breaking strength, but close enough to be a concern, especially considering shock loads.

• Spring Dampener: The spring dampener has a progressive rate from 800 lbs/in to 2200 lbs/in. It compresses from 16.25 in relaxed to 8.75 in compressed, a total compression of 7.5 in.

  • The force required to fully compress the spring is not linearly 2200 lbs/in×7.5 in. It's progressive.

  • Let's approximate the total force absorbed by the spring over its full compression range. If we average the rate (800+2200)/2=1500 lbs/in. Force to fully compress ≈1500 lbs/in×7.5 in=11,250 lbs.

  • The tension of 9016.7 lbs will cause significant compression of the spring. It would likely compress past its initial 800 lbs/in rate and into its higher rate, potentially getting close to its fully compressed length.

  • The winch will be the first point of failure. If the winch holds, the spring will absorb some of the shock and stretch, reducing the peak load on the cable and anchor.

• Anchor Post: The anchor post is a 5-inch round .25" pipe, 5 feet long, with 4 feet buried in a 16" diameter concrete-filled hole. The force from the cable will have a horizontal component of 6375.736 lbs and a vertical component (if the cable dips) which is not specified, but typically neglected for horizontal wind loads unless the cable is steeply angled. The primary load on the anchor is the horizontal pull. The concrete mass (16 in diameter, 4 ft deep) provides significant resistance to pull-out and bending. The soil around it provides additional passive resistance. A properly set 16 in concrete pier with 4 ft embedment in solid soil should withstand a horizontal load of 6375 lbs, but the pipe itself would need to be strong enough to transfer this load from the cable attachment point to the concrete. For a 5-inch diameter pipe, this load could cause bending or shear at the soil line if not properly reinforced within the concrete.
   

What if the wind reaches 65 mph?

1. Wind Pressure (P):

P65mph​=0.00256×(65 mph)2×Cd=0.00256×4225×Cd=10.82×Cd psf.

2. Total Wind Force:

• Fdock_struct​=280 sq. ft×10.82×1.5 psf=4544.4 lbs.

• Fboats​=96 sq. ft×10.82×1.2 psf=1246.0 lbs.

• Fwalkway​=97.5 sq. ft×10.82×1.5 psf=1582.4 lbs.

• Fcurrent​: Assuming current scales with wind speed. 0.015×65 mph=0.975 mph=1.43 ft/s.

  Fcurrent​=0.5×1.94×(1.43)2×56×1.0≈111.4 lbs.

• Ftotal_65mph​=4544.4+1246.0+1582.4+111.4=7484.2 lbs.

3. Tension in North Cable (65 mph):

T65mph​=7484.2 lbs/0.7071≈10,584.4 lbs.
 

Events at 65 mph:

• Winch Failure: The tension of 10,584.4 lbs is significantly over the 7000 lbs breaking load of the winch. The winch will certainly fail.

• Cable Strength: The cable (11,760 lbs breaking strength) is now much closer to its breaking limit. If the winch were to somehow hold, the cable would be under extreme stress.

• Anchor Post: The anchor post will experience a horizontal load of 7484.2 lbs. While still potentially within its ultimate capacity, repeated or sustained loads at this level could lead to fatigue or failure over time, especially if the pipe connection to the concrete is not robust.
   

What if the wind reaches 70 mph?

1. Wind Pressure (P):

P70mph​=0.00256×(70 mph)2×Cd=0.00256×4900×Cd=12.544×Cd psf.

2. Total Wind Force:

• Fdock_struct​=280 sq. ft×12.544×1.5 psf=5268.48 lbs.

• Fboats​=96 sq. ft×12.544×1.2 psf=1445.0 lbs.

• Fwalkway​=97.5 sq. ft×12.544×1.5 psf=1833.0 lbs.

• Fcurrent​: 0.015×70 mph=1.05 mph=1.54 ft/s.

  Fcurrent​=0.5×1.94×(1.54)2×56×1.0≈130.0 lbs.

• Ftotal_70mph​=5268.48+1445.0+1833.0+130.0=8676.48 lbs.

3. Tension in North Cable (70 mph):

T70mph​=8676.48 lbs/0.7071≈12,270.2 lbs.
 

Events at 70 mph:

• Winch Failure: The tension of 12,270.2 lbs far exceeds the winch's breaking load of 7000 lbs. The winch will definitely fail.

• Cable Failure: The cable's breaking strength is 11,760 lbs. The calculated tension (12,270.2 lbs) now exceeds the breaking strength of the 3/8" stainless steel cable. The cable is highly likely to break. This would lead to the dock becoming untethered from the north anchor.

• Anchor Post: The anchor post would experience a horizontal load of 8676.48 lbs just before the cable breaks. This load would be extreme and could cause significant damage to the post or its concrete foundation, even if it doesn't fail outright before the cable.
   

Shock Load on Cables and Impact Load on Anchor and Winch:

• Shock Load: When a sudden gust of wind hits, the load is not applied gradually. The "shock load" can be significantly higher than the static load. Factors like the elasticity of the cable and the presence of dampeners play a crucial role.

  • Without detailed dynamic analysis, it's hard to quantify the exact peak shock load. However, a common simplification is to consider a dynamic load factor. For sudden application of a load, this factor can be 2.0 or higher in extreme cases.

  • If we apply a factor of 1.5 (a moderate shock factor for non-impact loading) to the calculated tension:

    • At 60 mph: 9016.7 lbs×1.5=13,525 lbs. This load would certainly break the winch and potentially the cable (11,760 lbs breaking strength).

    • At 65 mph: 10,584.4 lbs×1.5=15,876.6 lbs. This would break both the winch and the cable.

    • At 70 mph: 12,270.2 lbs×1.5=18,405.3 lbs. This would also break both.

• Impact Load on Anchor and Winch: The impact load is directly related to the shock load in the cable. The winch receives the direct shock load from the cable. The anchor post then receives the shock load from the cable, transmitted through its attachment point.

  • Winch: The winches, with a WLL of 3500 lbs and a breaking load of 7000 lbs, are significantly undersized for the forces generated by a 60 mph wind gust, let alone higher speeds, especially considering shock loads. They will be the first component to fail.

  • Anchor: The anchor post and its concrete foundation are designed to resist pull-out and bending. The impact load means that the peak force is applied over a very short duration. The concrete's resistance to rapid loading is complex, but the design must account for dynamic forces. Given the high static loads already calculated, the additional shock load will severely test the integrity of the anchor system, particularly the connection between the pipe and the concrete. The pipe itself could bend or shear at the ground line.

 

Effect if cables were 5/16" instead of 3/8":

• 5/16" 316 SS Cable Breaking Strength: 8,825 lbs.

• At 60 mph: Calculated tension is 9016.7 lbs. If the cables were 5/16", this tension exceeds the cable's breaking strength (8825 lbs). The 5/16" cable would break at 60 mph.

• Conclusion: Using 5/16" cables would make the system even more vulnerable to failure at lower wind speeds. The cables would become the primary point of failure before the winches.
   

Effect if each cable was tensioned with 100 pounds of force to preload the coil spring dampeners:

• Preload Benefit: Preloading the coil spring dampeners with 100 lbs of force would mean they are already slightly compressed. This would help in two ways:

  1. Reduced Slack: It would take up any minor slack in the system, ensuring the spring immediately engages when tension increases.

  2. Smoother Response: It might slightly reduce the initial "jerk" when the wind hits by having the spring already active.

• Effect on Maximum Load: However, 100 lbs is a very small preload compared to the thousands of pounds of force the wind generates.

  • The spring's progressive rate starts at 800 lbs/in. A 100 lb preload would only compress it by 100/800=0.125 inches. This is negligible compared to the total 7.5 inches of travel and the high forces involved.

  • The overall outcome regarding winch and cable failure would remain the same, as the preload does not significantly alter the system's capacity to handle the very large wind-induced forces. The winch would still be the weakest link.
     

Effect if there were 2 feet of slack in each cable:

• Significant Problem: 2 feet of slack in each cable would be detrimental.

• Dynamic Loading/Impact: When the wind hits, the dock would accelerate until the slack is taken up. At that point, the cables would suddenly become taut, leading to a much higher impact load on the cables, winches, and anchors than if the slack were minimal.

  • Imagine a heavy object accelerating and then suddenly being stopped by a rope. The force exerted is much greater than the static force needed to hold the object.

  • The kinetic energy built up by the dock's movement would have to be absorbed by the stretching of the cable and the compression of the spring. This would result in peak forces that could be several times the calculated static forces.

• Increased Risk of Failure: This increased impact load would make failure of the winches and potentially the cables even more likely at lower wind speeds. The anchors would also be subjected to greater instantaneous stress.

• Dock Movement: The dock would move noticeably (potentially several feet) before the cables engage, potentially causing damage to the walkway hinge or the dock itself if it impacts other structures or the shoreline.
   

Effect if a second set of 3/8" 316 stainless 7x19 anchor cables were installed (cross-braced):

• Configuration:

  • Northwest winch to South shore anchor.

  • Southwest winch to North shore anchor.
     

• Load Distribution: With wind from the south, pushing the dock north:

  • The original cable from the northwest corner to the north anchor (let's call this NW-N) would still take a significant tension load, resisting the northward push.

  • The new cable from the southwest corner to the north anchor (let's call this SW-N) would also take a tension load, as it pulls the south-west corner of the dock northward.

  • The original cable from the southwest corner to the south anchor (SW-S) would likely go slack or experience very low tension as the dock moves northward.

  • The new cable from the northwest corner to the south anchor (NW-S) would also likely go slack or experience very low tension.
     

• Improved Stability and Redundancy: This cross-braced configuration offers significant advantages:

  • Improved Load Sharing: The wind force pushing north would now be resisted by two cables (NW-N and SW-N). While the angles might be different for each, the total horizontal resistance would be shared. This would effectively halve the load on each individual cable and winch in the ideal scenario (assuming symmetrical angles and stiffness).

  • Increased System Capacity: With two cables sharing the load, the total breaking strength of the anchoring system (in the direction of the wind) would be doubled.

  • Enhanced Redundancy: If one winch or cable were to fail, the other cable would still be in place to provide some resistance, preventing the dock from completely breaking free immediately.
     

• Recalculated Tension (simplified for 60 mph):

  • If the 6375.736 lbs wind force is shared equally by two cables at 45-degree angles to the direction of force:

  • Each cable would take 6375.736 lbs/2=3187.868 lbs of horizontal force.

  • Tension per cable: 3187.868 lbs/cos(45∘)≈4500 lbs.
     

• Outcome with Cross-Bracing:

  • At 60 mph: Tension of 4500 lbs per cable.

    • Winches: This tension is still above the 3500 lbs WLL of the winches, but it is below their 7000 lbs breaking load. This means the winches might hold, though they would be operating under stress and potentially failing prematurely over time.

    • Cables: The 4500 lbs tension is well within the 11,760 lbs breaking strength of the 3/8" cables.
       

  • At 65 mph: Total force 7484.2 lbs. Force per cable 3742.1 lbs (horizontal). Tension per cable ≈5290 lbs.

    • Winches: Still below breaking load, but still exceeding WLL.

    • Cables: Well within breaking strength.
       

  • At 70 mph: Total force 8676.48 lbs. Force per cable 4338.24 lbs (horizontal). Tension per cable ≈6135 lbs.

    • Winches: Still below breaking load (7000 lbs), but very close, and exceeding WLL.

    • Cables: Well within breaking strength.

• Conclusion: Adding a second set of cross-braced cables significantly improves the safety margin for the cables themselves and makes the system much more resilient, even though the winches would still be operating above their recommended working load limit. The system would be much less likely to fail catastrophically.
   

Effect if the coil spring dampeners were removed:

• Increased Shock Load: The primary function of the coil spring dampeners is to absorb and dissipate energy from sudden loads, thereby reducing shock loads on the cables, winches, and anchors.

• Stiffer System: Without the dampeners, the entire anchoring system would become much "stiffer." When the wind gust hits, the load would be transmitted almost instantaneously and directly to the cables and winches.

• Higher Peak Forces: This lack of elasticity would result in much higher peak forces (shock loads) being experienced by all components. The energy from the sudden wind impact would have nowhere to go but into the elastic deformation (stretching) of the cable and the structural components, or into their failure.

• Increased Risk of Catastrophic Failure:

  • Winches: The winches, already undersized, would be even more susceptible to immediate failure due to the increased shock loading.

  • Cables: The cables would experience higher peak tensions, increasing their risk of breaking, even at lower wind speeds than calculated for the dampened system.

  • Anchors: The anchor posts and their concrete foundations would be subjected to sharper, more intense impact loads, increasing the likelihood of structural damage or pull-out.

• Overall: Removing the dampeners would significantly weaken the system's ability to withstand dynamic wind gusts and dramatically increase the likelihood of component failure.
   

Summary of Key Findings and Recommendations:

1. Winch Under-sizing: The most critical weakness identified is the winches. Their 3500 lbs WLL and 7000 lbs breaking load are insufficient for the calculated wind forces, even at 60 mph. They are likely to fail first.

2. Cable Vulnerability (Single System): Without cross-bracing, the single 3/8" cable approaches or exceeds its breaking strength at 70 mph, and even at 60 mph when considering shock loads.

3. Shock Loads: Dynamic effects (sudden gusts) amplify the static wind forces, making the system much more susceptible to failure. The 60-second duration of the gust is long enough for the full static load to develop, but the initial impact is key.

4. Benefits of Dampeners: The coil spring dampeners are essential for mitigating shock loads and extending the life of the system by absorbing energy. Removing them is a significant risk.

5. Benefits of Cross-Bracing: A cross-braced cable system (second set of cables) is highly recommended. It significantly distributes the load, increases redundancy, and lowers the stress on individual components, making the overall system much more robust and less prone to catastrophic failure.

6. Anchor Post: While the anchor posts appear substantial, the connection of the pipe to the concrete and the pipe's bending strength under these extreme loads should be verified by a structural engineer, especially with potential shock loads.
    

Recommendations for Improvement:

• Upgrade Winches: Replace the existing winches with units that have a working load limit significantly higher than the anticipated maximum cable tension, ideally with a minimum WLL of 7000 lbs (to match the old breaking strength) or more, considering the calculated tensions. For a single cable system, winches with WLL of at least 10,000 lbs would be advisable. With a cross-braced system, 5000 lbs WLL winches might suffice, but higher is always better for safety margins.

• Implement Cross-Bracing: Adding the second set of cross-braced 3/8" cables would drastically improve the system's resilience and safety factor.

• Maintain Dampeners: Ensure the coil spring dampeners are well-maintained and functioning correctly.

• Regular Inspections: Regularly inspect all components (cables, winches, anchor points, dock structure) for signs of stress, fatigue, or damage, especially after severe weather events.